Cleveland hires a nationally renowed Harvard economist who found no systemic bias in police searches.
Cleveland’s mayor hired a “nationally renowned Harvard economist who found ‘no evidence of systemic bias in police searches’.”
Meanwhile, Cincinnati hired a civil rights activist who, possibly on city time, strolls around, interferes with the police, and encourages the public to file complaints against police officers in order to get those officers on her “list.”
My sense is that the Mayor Pureval’s consultant would not like to see such a study conducted here in Cincinnati and definitely would not like to see those results, especially if it meant that her services were no longer needed.
What else could explain why the city’s consultant failed to recommend such a study during the 3 years she has been under contract with the city?
You would think that if Cleveland’s mayor could figure it out, Cincinnati’s mayor could figure it out as well. But I guess not.
The full article can be found at:
A copy is also be posted in my research library.
